daz2905 Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 So***** husband/wife/bitch***** has been having threesomes with a other men. I honestly can't understand why they went to court to try and stop the British papers running the story. Even more bizarre when the story has already been printed in the National Enquirer in the United States. It's already in the public domain and all over the internet and all they have achieved is to draw even more attention to a story that had very little interest to begin with. I honestly don't understand why they take it this far and why the hell a judge would even uphold a judgement like this. IMHO, if you're in the public eye and you put yourself in a position where you become involved in a scandal then it's you're problem to deal with. You can't use the media to show yourself in a good light and then expect them to back off when you get caught out doing something you shouldn't be doing. Seems to me that everyone who has got a super injunction ends up with a story that follows them around for years, like ******************* and god knows how many others will be exposed in the future. Should we really let these people waste the courts time by even entertaining their arguments when they are trying to hide stories that are without argument true. All in the hope that the image they have created for themselves via the media is not tarnished by something as inconvenient as the truth? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snuffs99 Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 LMFAo, it is all pathetic that i could go to jail for saying who it is when it took me literally 2 min to find out via the net...........Must warn you though its hardly a shock or life changing knowledge. lol...bit like a candle in the wind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz2905 Posted April 8, 2016 Author Share Posted April 8, 2016 Sorry about naming the celeb Fon, thought we were safe here but better to be safe than sorry. It took me about 2 minutes to find it yesterday as well, was really looking forward to seeing who was involved in a celeb threesome and what the woman looked like. A further half hour was spent scraping vomit from my keyboard at the realisation of my excitement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakdos Posted April 8, 2016 Share Posted April 8, 2016 What pisses me off in all this is the sheer hypocrisy saying that the ruling is there to protect the kids. Now, surely if they REALLY wanted to protect the kids, then don't do it in the first place? Just me being a simple guy I suppose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diddy Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Well unless someone can furnish us with the details then we will all still be in the dark. I suppose we could light a candle in the wind to help with the darkness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StonerUK Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 That was some terrible hints diddy [emoji23] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktv303 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 These injunctions only apply in England And Wales. I'm in Scotland It's *********** sent from my phone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snuffs99 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Your in Scotland mate but this server/domain is located/registered in England. Suppose its a bit like an American coming and posting on the BBC News website, still not OK. Besides, if Diddys hints didn't give it away there is no hope for those who don't already know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diddy Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Your in Scotland mate but this server/domain is located/registered in England. Suppose its a bit like an American coming and posting on the BBC News website, still not OK. Besides, if Diddys hints didn't give it away there is no hope for those who don't already know. Well im still standing here wondering what happens lol....By the way can I just say none of these are my hints lol...just what I saw posted around twitter...Im up at my fathers house for the last week and catching up with old friends and family so until I saw this thread I hadn't even heard of the whole affair lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktv303 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 No worries snuffs. I'd never heard a peep about it till this thread appeared either. sent from my phone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snuffs99 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Hehe i read about it in one of the tabloids, mainly about the super injunction and how the UK papers were banned from printing etc..... so spent all of 2 min online to find the whole story...pathetic censorship by the UK courts tbh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktv303 Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 well the sunday mail covered this story yesterday with the front page headline "America knows, the internet knows, now Scotland knows." then causally named and shamed the both of them lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sh4ckles Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 I found out who with in a couple of mins also.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.